DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23332>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23332 RadioGroup tag to avoid using scriplet expressions with nested iterators ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-09-22 19:14 ------- This is not the first enhancement request that I've submitted but it's going to be the last one (based on the responses I get) So I won't bother you ever again. I want to make a few points here before I go away. First, I want to give an answer to "I don't see any scriptlets in the example, only JSP expressions.". Look at http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/faqs/indexedprops.html and see how it's called there: "That scriptlet expression for the "property" attribute is something we want to avoid." Secondly, a lot of things (in fact all of the things) can be done w/out tags using <%%> or EL. So why create any tags at all ? Here is where it's explained in details: http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/taglibraries.html and obviously you know it since you have created a good number of them. Lastly, if you would look at the mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] you would find a huge number of submissions regarding the same issues with html:radio tag. Most of them do not have any response. Those that do use <%%>. If that does not constitute the creation of the RadioGroup tag for you then nothing else would. Thanks for creating a great framework. I do not understand why you refuse to enhance it to make it even better. Of course, you do not have to. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
