Do we need to worry about the implementation? Can't we just write against javax.sql.RowSet, and leave the implementation up to the developer? "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > In the short term, it might make sense for somebody to write a > javax.sql.RowSet implementation for a "read only" RowSet. Looking at the > APIs, it doesn't seem like this would be terribly difficult to do -- just > throw an exception for all of the operations that modify the existing > data.
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Ted Husted
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Ted Husted
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Ted Husted
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Ted Husted
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Craig R. McClanahan
- Re[2]: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Oleg V Alexeev
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Jonathan Asbell
- Re: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Ted Husted
- RE: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Immanuel, Gidado-Yisa
- RE: Struts 1.1 To-Do - RowSets Craig R. McClanahan