On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Ted Husted wrote:
> Do we need to worry about the implementation?
>
> Can't we just write against javax.sql.RowSet, and leave the
> implementation up to the developer?
>
In other words, make them go download the CachedRowSet early access (or
some other implementation) themselves, and integrate it? Yah, that's
certainly possible, but an "all in one" download would certainly be more
convenient.
The tags themselves would certainly be written to the RowSet APIs -- I'd
just like to offer a nice RowSet implementation that is optimized for the
use case we envision here (read-only access, so we don't need all the
extra complexity of CachedRowSet's ability to update the database later).
Craig
> "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> > In the short term, it might make sense for somebody to write a
> > javax.sql.RowSet implementation for a "read only" RowSet. Looking at the
> > APIs, it doesn't seem like this would be terribly difficult to do -- just
> > throw an exception for all of the operations that modify the existing
> > data.
>
