"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > Doing something smart (like a browser-detection mechanism) sounds like a > good case for an application subclass of ActionForward that overrides the > getPath(Locale) method. Perhaps we should pass in the current request, > instead of the Locale, so that the method could get whatever it needed.
+1 And for the record, I don't think any of us want to get into a browser-detection mechanism, just provide a hook for anything like that that an application might want to use. > You mean in the getMessage() method signatures? It'd be pretty easy to > add one more overloaded method that takes an array instead. Yes. People have asked about that several times, but I've never been sure of the answer. I wondered if it was because we had to use a certain number of parameters in the bean tags. But we could do both, yes? -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA. -- Custom Software ~ Technical Services. -- Tel +1 716 737-3463 -- http://www.husted.com/struts/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
