"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > The reason I still want to call the next release 1.1 is this: despite the > huge number of internal changes, the fundamental APIs for applications > *are* pretty much backwards compatible. That's a promise that was made > early on in Struts development, and I want to honor that. Calling it 1.5 > or 2.0 would raise concerns in people's minds about compatibility -- even > if those fears turned out to be unfounded.
Not to mention the endless what happened to 1.1 - 1.4 questions :) Personally, I'm hoping that 2.0 will be woulda-coulda-shoulda version of Struts :), where we have to break out the automatic migration tools to update the struts-config's and all that :) (Though, technically, aren't we suppose to refer to Struts Next (or something) until the release plan comes around. Rules for Revolutionaries, and so forth.) -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA. -- Building Java web applications with Struts. -- Tel +1 585 737-3463. -- Web http://www.husted.com/struts/ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
