Ted Husted wrote: >I agree that a beta based on the current nightly build is a reasonable >course of action for now. > >My real regret is that we did not get a chance to cut a 1.1 release >before the last wave of improvements came done the pipeline. My concern >is that either the release-cycle will now be extended, while we absorb >the new features, or will be rushed, just to move things along. > >Of course, Craig's work is consistently excellent, and the likelihood of >any actual problems is slight to none. > >My underlying goal is to remind us that Struts is being used by some >very serious teams on some very serious projects. These teams rely on >the "#.#" release stamp to tell them that the codebase is ready for >primetime, and it is our responsibility to ensure that it is. > >I would usually expect changes this significant to live in the nightly >build for several months before release. But, keeping the other features >out the hands of production teams is now bordering on cruelty. > >So, I guess, it comes down to "in for a penny, in for a pound"; are we >ready to cut a beta? > >-Ted. > +1
-- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting http://www.multitask.com.au/developers -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
