----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:45 PM Subject: Re: Beta 1 update
> > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:24:34 -0800 > > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Beta 1 update > > > > OK, that's fine. I can do the build either Tuesday or Wednesday. Let's shoot > > for code freeze at midnight tonight (i.e. 12:00 Pacific time on Monday). > > David (and Craig), if you need more time, let me know and we can extend the > > deadline to midnight on Tuesday instead. > > > > I'll make sure I tag the appropriate parts of Commons with the same tag. > > However, let me make sure what I have in mind matches what you have in mind, > > Craig. My plan is to build Beta 1 with the Release versions of Commons > > projects that we *can* build against, and CVS versions of those projects > > that don't have Release versions that we can use. This would mean Release > > versions of Collections (1.0), Digester (1.1.1) and Logging (1.0), and CVS > > versions of the rest. I would only tag the non-release project trees. Is > > this also what you had in mind? > > > > I've only tested the Struts 1.1 code against the current HEAD branch of > Digester. This is also important in order to be able to put struts.jar in > a shared repository (like common/lib in Tomcat 4). OK, I'll build against top of trunk for Digester as well. -- Martin Cooper > > The 1.0 version of collections should be fine -- we only use FastHashMap. > > > One more thing. Craig, there is one file that you removed after I previously > > tagged CVS, so I need to, uh, update the repository to remove the tag so > > that the file is not included in Beta 1. The file I need access to is: > > > > /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util/Attic/GenericConne > > ction.java,v > > > > If you could chown the file to me, or allow group write access, I can make > > the change. Thanks. > > > > Unfortunately, only root can chown files to someone else. I'd suggest we > just create a new "beta 1" tag instead. > > > -- > > Martin Cooper > > > > Craig > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:23 AM > > Subject: Re: Beta 1 update > > > > > > > +1, but if you can wait until after midnight (Pacific Time) tonight, I'll > > > be able to get some more bug fixes done. > > > > > > I also did some fixes/enhancements in commons-beanutils over the weekend, > > > which raises a point -- it would also be good to tag the specific bits of > > > the Commons packages that you include in the beta with the same tag. > > > Since Martin has commit access on jakarta-commons, this shouldn't be a > > > problem. And, nobody should complain since CVS doesn't give a rip how > > > many tags there are (just don't create branch tags). > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:41:22 -0800 > > > > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Subject: Beta 1 update > > > > > > > > First of all, I sincerely apologise to you all for the length of time it > > is > > > > taking to get Beta 1 out the door. Unfortunately, I managed to get sick, > > and > > > > still haven't quite got back to full strength yet. > > > > > > > > A few things have happened since I tagged the CVS tree for Beta 1. > > > > > > > > 1) Craig has made a boatload of bug fixes to the code base. > > > > > > > > 2) Arron made some changes to the nested taglib which he requested be > > > > included in Beta 1. > > > > > > > > 3) David made many changes to Validator and the way it hooks into > > Struts. He > > > > also updated some of the files in CVS to tag them as part of Beta 1. > > > > > > > > 4) Rob is checking in UML diagrams as I write this. > > > > > > > > Given these changes, and especially given the already-updated tags in > > CVS, I > > > > think it would make sense at this point to retag the entire tree to pick > > up > > > > the latest of everything as Beta 1. This would give us a better, > > stronger, > > > > first beta. I promise to complete the beta release process in one phase > > this > > > > time, to avoid a repeat of the current situation. > > > > > > > > Is everyone OK with this approach? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
