i would be happy to put my name against this (and a matching test case) if no one else 
has already. 

a quick question on the preferred approach: 
a) quick (and dirty) would be to take a copy of the existing html taglib and hack...
b) i'd prefer to look for commonality in the 2 taglibs and just subclass for the 
separate bits. this may also have advantages for wml or xforms? perhaps the package 
structure might be: 
org.apache.struts.taglib.xml
org.apache.struts.taglib.xml.html
org.apache.struts.taglib.xml.xhtml

obviously b) has greater impact on the existing code. perhaps this could be 
retrofitted once xhtml was up and running? 

what do you think? 
tim 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to