be carefull because the html isn't xml but sgml. Your packages names can confused newbies.
It would be better to do somethink like : org.apache.struts.taglib.commons org.apache.struts.taglib.xhtml org.apache.struts.taglib.html org.apache.struts.taglib.wml ... It's only my opinion and I'm not a committer. Arnaud > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Stephenson Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : lundi 15 juillet 2002 08:21 > À : Struts mailing list (E-mail) > Objet : Volunteer for xhtml taglib > > > i would be happy to put my name against this (and a matching > test case) if no one else has already. > > a quick question on the preferred approach: > a) quick (and dirty) would be to take a copy of the existing > html taglib and hack... > b) i'd prefer to look for commonality in the 2 taglibs and > just subclass for the separate bits. this may also have > advantages for wml or xforms? perhaps the package structure might be: > org.apache.struts.taglib.xml > org.apache.struts.taglib.xml.html > org.apache.struts.taglib.xml.xhtml > > obviously b) has greater impact on the existing code. perhaps > this could be retrofitted once xhtml was up and running? > > what do you think? > tim > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >
winmail.dat
Description: application/ms-tnef
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
