Ted Husted wrote: >10/16/2002 5:22:13 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Don't have time to dive into the substantive technical details today, but >>in general I'm OK with a strategy of comma-delimited list of >>struts-config.xml resource files used to configure a single app module >>(consistent with the Tiles and Validators styles). I presume this just >>means running as many Digester.parse() calls as you need, and no other >>fundamental changes, right? >> >Yes. Sorry if I was obtuse. > >I really should have just committed the change first, and talked about it afterwards. > >I guess that why we work by Lazy Consensus =:0) > I think I finally see your point on this too. I'm just too thick-headed and open-mouthed. My concern is valid, but as long as I feel fairly sure I'm not going to get a change veto'd - or tear something up - it would best to just implement the change and ask questions later.
>But I'll go ahead and do that next and see if anyone squawks. > >-Ted. > I think we've all had a turn at being obtuse today, Ted - don't feel like you have a monopoly going ;-) -- Eddie Bush -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
