Just of the box... Ted, others, what if we just delayed subapps till after? .V
Byrne, Steven wrote: > Definitely a big part of what 1.1 is all about is integrating Tiles and > Validator into the main Struts distribution. Pulling them back into > pseudo-contrib status would not be a good thing. > > Has anyone estimated the level of effort to make each of them be sub-app > aware? I imagine it's non-trival, but not overly large. And, since we > have new, eager, smart committers with plenty of energy and motivation, > I would think that these changes could be done in a reasonable > timeframe, perhaps with a little guidance from the original authors of > the respective components. > > Steve > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:27 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability >> >> >>To me, validator and tiles are part of the core. Without >>them, struts loses >>much of its utility and importance. >> >>David >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>From: Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>Subject: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability >>>Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:54:18 -0500 >>> >>>At 12:27 PM -0700 2002/10/16, Martin Cooper wrote: >>> >>>> > Now that we have modules in play, would anyone VETO adding >>>> >>>>> the capability to have a delimited list of struts- >>>>> configs (for each module) -- to match what we do with the >>>>> tiles and validator configurations? If for no other >>>>> reason, than because we should be providing a consistent >>>>> approach across components. >>>> >>>>Would I veto adding new functionality in a second beta that >>> >>everyone is >> >>>>waiting for a final release of? I'd have to seriously consider it. >>> >>>Would it seriously mess up the current release cycle to >> >>decouple Tiles and >> >>>Validator from the core as an attempt to simplify the 1.1 >> >>release? It >> >>>seems like there needs to be a "middle-ground" between the >> >>"contrib" folder >> >>>and the core where useful tools can be developed and >> >>released without >> >>>interfering with the core. >>> >>>Joe >>>-- >>>-- >>>* Joe Germuska { [EMAIL PROTECTED] } >>>"It's pitiful, sometimes, if they've got it bad. Their eyes >> >>get glazed, >> >>>they go white, their hands tremble.... As I watch them I >> >>often feel that a >> >>>dope peddler is a gentleman compared with the man who sells records." >>> --Sam Goody, 1956 >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> >>_________________________________________________________________ >>Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online >>http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
