Dunno. I've never tried to use relative paths myself. > -----Original Message----- > From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@;swbell.net] > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:46 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Struts-EL - BUILD FAILED > > > Ok - exploring that path. I need to know how the directory > structure is > on the machine nightlies run on (Craig's machine?). Does he have the > different servlet APIs out there on the same level as the > Struts directory? > > Either all paths have to be specified as relative or they must be > absolute (duh!). Currently they're relative - but incorrect > (at least > in my updated checkout they are). Should we stay relative and expect > there will be checkouts of the dependencies on the same level as the > "jakarta-struts" directory (ie jakarta-taglibs, etc), or move to > specifying those base directory names independently? > > Any preference? Which is "best"? I'm thinking that the > least painful > approach would be to stick with relative paths and expect > people would > have the dependencies checked out on the "same level" as > struts. Sound > good? > > When I say "same level", I mean: > > someDirectory/ > jakarta-struts/ > jakarta-taglibs/ > somethingElse/ > > they all share the same parent directory. > > Karr, David wrote: > > >You don't really need to build the JSTL, just use the binary package. > > > > -- > Eddie Bush > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
