10/17/2002 4:05:47 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Three quick notes: > >* We should specifically ask on the user list about the timing > of Servlet 2.3 / JSP 1.2 dependence. I would expect this to > be a bit controversial on that short a time frame. On the > other hand, knowing we could interoperate with (and not just > integrate with) JSTL (and JSF when done) would be nice. -0 I would be concerned about letting that genie out of the bottle until we have a specific usecase for 2.3/1.2. I think focusing on interoperating with JSTL/JSF in 1.2.x but integrating itfor the 2.0.x series, which seems like a fair plan to me. With the platform change, both codebases could proceed simulatneously, so 2.0.x would not have to "wait" for 1.2.x. If during implementation, 2.3/1.2 support becomes irresistiable for specific reasons, then we can ask around. >* If the STXX folks are still interested, I'd like to see > more formal support for XML processing pipelines be included > in a 1.2 time frame. This will help people who want to > leverage Struts in a "web services hype" world, as well as > being generally useful. +1 >* I'd defer a decision on whether Struts 2.0 advances to Servlet > 2.4 and JSP 2.0 or not for a while yet -- to me, it really > depends on the adoption rate for J2EE 1.4 and the availability > of products that run it. From the Struts perspective, Servlet 2.3->2.4 > doesn't buy a lot, but the JSP 1.2->2.0 changes are going to be > very very useful. +1 -T. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>