I posted a starter version of the roadmap so we'd have something to patch :0)
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/status.html -Ted. 10/16/2002 4:42:10 PM, "Byrne, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Definitely a big part of what 1.1 is all about is integrating Tiles and >Validator into the main Struts distribution. Pulling them back into >pseudo-contrib status would not be a good thing. > >Has anyone estimated the level of effort to make each of them be sub-app >aware? I imagine it's non-trival, but not overly large. And, since we >have new, eager, smart committers with plenty of energy and motivation, >I would think that these changes could be done in a reasonable >timeframe, perhaps with a little guidance from the original authors of >the respective components. > >Steve > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980@;hotmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:27 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability >> >> >> To me, validator and tiles are part of the core. Without >> them, struts loses >> much of its utility and importance. >> >> David >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >From: Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >> >"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Subject: RE: Tiles Refactorings for 1.1 compatability >> >Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 14:54:18 -0500 >> > >> >At 12:27 PM -0700 2002/10/16, Martin Cooper wrote: >> >> > Now that we have modules in play, would anyone VETO adding >> >>> the capability to have a delimited list of struts- >> >>> configs (for each module) -- to match what we do with the >> >>> tiles and validator configurations? If for no other >> >>> reason, than because we should be providing a consistent >> >>> approach across components. >> >> >> >>Would I veto adding new functionality in a second beta that >> everyone is >> >>waiting for a final release of? I'd have to seriously consider it. >> > >> >Would it seriously mess up the current release cycle to >> decouple Tiles and >> >Validator from the core as an attempt to simplify the 1.1 >> release? It >> >seems like there needs to be a "middle-ground" between the >> "contrib" folder >> >and the core where useful tools can be developed and >> released without >> >interfering with the core. >> > >> >Joe >> >-- >> >-- >> >* Joe Germuska { [EMAIL PROTECTED] } >> >"It's pitiful, sometimes, if they've got it bad. Their eyes >> get glazed, >> >they go white, their hands tremble.... As I watch them I >> often feel that a >> >dope peddler is a gentleman compared with the man who sells records." >> > --Sam Goody, 1956 >> > >> >-- >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> ><mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: >> ><mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online >> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> >> >> > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
