Eddie, I am a long time Struts/Tiles users, and I response to this group once in a while or when needed too. Just because I seemly bussy with my daily work. I have high respect for the 'OG' Struts contributors, lik Craig, Ted, Cedric, and many others group users, whose believe in making a different in raising web application development to a higher standard. Every since I see your name appear on the list, I Starting to wonder??? Eddie, beside 'entertaining' people do you have any other thing to do? May be, A real Job?.....
--danny Ps. If I've offended anyone, I am sorry !!!! -----Original Message----- From: Eddie Bush [mailto:ekbush@;swbell.net] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 7:02 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] How should Tiles be refactored?How Cedric Dumoulin wrote: > Eddie Bush wrote: > >> Hi again, Cedric :-) >> >> We need to "hurry" 1.1, and the only way I see to do that is for each >> of us to agree to seperatism in 1.1 - understanding and *expecting* >> that 1.2 will be our chance to solve the problems we wanted to solve >> in 1.1 but couldn't (because of time). > > I am sorry, but I still disagree on the "separatism" point ;-). Or > maybe we don't understand the same thing by "separatism". Tiles is a > framework to share common piece of work. You can't say now: Tiles > allow to share work, but you still have to duplicate when you use > module ! I'm going to shut up now :-) I was just looking at ways to expedite 1.1F. > The Ted's proposal is a good starting point. We need now to check if > it fulfill simple needs, and if there is no incompatibility with > complex cases. I will check that with existing applications. > Implementing it doesn't seem too complicated. Even having seperatism in 1.1 would be better than the current support non-default modules have -- wouldn't you agree? It's one step in the right direction. I *do* realize what I suggest is less than desirable -- and I personally wouldn't complain if you commited code that gave us something better -- but we should be focused primarily on 1.1F having modules that work - even if not as "fully" as we'd like (ie. there is not sharing). > Cedric As I said, I'm going to shut up and find something else to fix. It sounds like you have this well in-hand, and "discussing it to death" is just going to prolong the process of effecting whatever change comes. -- Eddie Bush -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
