DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332 RequestUtils.applicationClass problem with ContextClassLoader [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-07 20:43 ------- After some discussion (and enlightenment), a resolution has been reached. Ted Husted wrote: >I think its important to keep in mind that we don't support >containers, we support specifications. In practice, we sometimes >make allowances for certain containers, so long as they are not >too far out of spec. In the past, Struts has generated a few >service packs to bring containers into compliance. (Yeah! Us!) > >The problem I sense here is that some containers might misbehave >on this point. We don't have a testing lab with WebSphere and >iPlanet and WebLogic and JRun and SilverStream and so on all lined >up in row where we can run these tests. We have to rely on the >kindness of strangers to try this for us and report back. > >IMHO, this does not seem like not the time to mess about with the >classloaders (and we all know how much we ~love~ classloaders). > >Unless someone is going to tag this as a "showstopper" for the 1.1 >release, I'd say we can mark this LATER and move on. > >-Ted. > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
