The ActionForm is pluggable, and we have always shipped with one implementation that defaults to session and another that defaults to request.
I believe that originally we used session since that was liable to cause the least amount of confusion. Then we got into the habit of using reset to clear everything, which caused all the same confusion session scope might avoid (where did my values go?). Request might be a better default. Since it is pluggable, we might also be able to change it sooner than 2.0.x if we wanted. -Ted. 11/11/2002 7:05:22 PM, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I remember someone kind of scoffing at us defaulting forms to session >scope -- and adding further that request is really what we should have >gone with. They further added that this functionality could not be >easily changed, since there were so many Struts apps deployed that >undoubtedly relied on the behavior. > >So ... is this something to slate for 2.0? :-) (if we even still >*have* the notion of a form-bean!) > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
