David
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Unclear semantics on form use for "wizards"
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 21:18:09 -0500
The ActionForm is pluggable, and we have always shipped with one
implementation that defaults to session and another that defaults
to request.
I believe that originally we used session since that was liable to
cause the least amount of confusion. Then we got into the habit of
using reset to clear everything, which caused all the same
confusion session scope might avoid (where did my values go?).
Request might be a better default. Since it is pluggable, we might
also be able to change it sooner than 2.0.x if we wanted.
-Ted.
11/11/2002 7:05:22 PM, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I remember someone kind of scoffing at us defaulting forms to
session
>scope -- and adding further that request is really what we should
have
>gone with. They further added that this functionality could not
be
>easily changed, since there were so many Struts apps deployed
that
>undoubtedly relied on the behavior.
>
>So ... is this something to slate for 2.0? :-) (if we even
still
>*have* the notion of a form-bean!)
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
