I would just like to instigate some trouble along with this question
since I am a big fan of the "Chain Of Repsonsibility" pattern
and agree that it can do a nice job of creating atomic
and reusable code structures.

I would also like to say that I think it could be confusing
to have a chain action.  The example provided for invoking
actions based on Locale is handled by implementing someone's
own custom RequestProcessor.  Fan of the COR pattern I may be
but implementing a custom RequestProcessor seems cleaner.

One problem if you implement COR is how do you assemble and execute chains?
Where do you store this info?

Servlet Filters offer another chance to implement COR.

Perhaps I'm hallucinating again,  but has craig talked about COR and Java
Server Faces?

I think its' great if the contribution doesn't hurt anything else and
pending
the design is good.  But I think most cases for use in a COR environment
can be handled other ways.  COR is a nice way to redirect output streams
for several transformations of the output stream.  Say you had one action
that read data from a database and output xml.  You could continue to add
chain processors until it outputs a PDF file.


-Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Baum [mailto:kbaum@;Tallan.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:19 PM
To: Struts Developers Lis
Subject: ChainAction class


Over the past year and a half, I have developed using the Struts platform.

During this time, my colleagues and I created an Action class which allows
other actions to be chained together.  This design resembled the Chain of
Responsibility pattern.   The ChainAction class was well received by the
many other developers on our project.  Most importantly it helped keep our
Action components simple and modular and promoted reuse in our code.  In
addition, the ChainAction class allowed for different Actions to be executed
based on Locale.

I have been benefiting from the Struts Model View Controller framework for
some time and would like to contribute the ChainAction class to the
framework.  The addition of the ChainAction class would require no change
to the existing Struts code base and would only offer Struts users an
additional Action class implementation.

I would like to gauge the interest other Struts developers have in this
idea.  Thanks.

Karl



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to