On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 18:46:54 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: LogFactory compile error with Commons Logging 1.0.2 > > Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > > On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > > >>Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 13:47:55 -0800 (PST) > >>From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Subject: Re: LogFactory compile error with Commons Logging 1.0.2 > >> > >> > >> > >>On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > >> > >> > >>>What about DBCP? > >> > >>I know there have been quite a few changes in DBCP since its 1.0 release. > >>I don't really track DBCP, so I don't know how much is bug fixes versus > >>other changes (like incorporating jdbc2pool), but I think it's likely that > >>we'll want a DBCP 1.1 for Struts 1.1 Final. > >> > > > > > > Yep. > > > So, should we be specifying the DBCP Nightly Build now, or is 1.0 > sufficient? > We want to say "latest nightly build" for now. It looks like Martin tagged the commons libraries he pulled with (STRUTS_1_1_B3), as I suggested. So 1.1-b3 users will be able to see exactly what code was included. > -Ted. Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
