No HTML-EL in 1.2? Is that final? .V
"David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The templates taglib is already deprecated. We won't move the base servlet > spec to 2.3 until 2.0 which means no filters, el, or jstl dependencies. > > Thanks for the suggestions. > David > > > > >From: "Vic Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: exit stratefy was Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft deadline > >Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:13:45 -0500 > > > >If I can say .... > >Please consider releasing nightly build (w/o EL) very, very soon, as a RC1; > >+ plus a note of the know bugs. > >(I know it's not ideal, but it's an *exit* strategy). > >As soon as the bugs are fixed, release. > >Of course if something *new* shows up in RC1, then have RC2. > > > >At this point I would rather have 1.1a if something new shows up; other > >Jakarta projects have. > > > > > >Note: I plant to try to take basicPortal.com to Jakarta incubator, very > >soon, coments welcome. > > > >And if anyone wants to contribute to an online class (people only pay > >"WebEx" charges), coming up very soon. > > > >vc at basebeans.com > > > >Then my 1.2 wishlist (Craig?) > >- HTML-el > >- ship with JSTL (Maven?) > >- deprecate templates > >- deprecate (means will be gone after 2.0) beans tag (so people can use > >core > >tag) > >- split struts jar in 2. One for tags(and nested), one for rest. (So one > >day > >Struts could move most it's tags to jakarta.taglibs. Thus people can render > >anyway they want, ex: Faces tag) > >- include simple version of Scafolding BaseAction (w/ default disptach) and > >BaseFormBean (w/ beantuils to copy multirow) - This hints people in a good > >direction. > >- better tiles and login example (Container based security) > >- filters? listeners? > >- please include struts-menu by S. Skyles (in strutstags.jar), it is > >popular > >as any tag and singe point for navigations. > >- faces "extension" > >- multi row example app in contrib ? > >- master/detail example app in contrib ? > >- Servlet 2.3 > >(be glad to do half of any of above) > > > >Past 2.0 wish list: > >- Axis controller > >- Commons-SQL or Castor (or RowSet) example app w/Struts. > >- DAO interface/factory (in Commons?) > >- Deprecate most tags (let people use taglibs for render,or Velocity, or > >faces....) but support JSP 2.0 in this release (HTML-EL, Faces, Tiles, > >Validator only; no logic, etc. support) > >- XML "generator". Have you used JasperReports? "He" create an XML file > >that > >"compiles" to something else. So if we create a XML file (with bands?) that > >"compiles" to JSP and struts.config, ,etc.? Then others can write XML > >generators for any output. Of course, base extension classes behind. > >- JDK1.4 required > >- Servlet 2.4 > >- There were a lot of 2.0 ideas.... I can't recall them. > > > >It is more exciting past 1.1. > > > >.V > > > > > > > > > > > >"Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I would agree with Craig that dates are good motivators for cutting > > > betas, but to cut a Release Candidate, logically, we need to be > > > release-ready. The objective release-ready test is what shows up in > > > Bugzilla. So, someone has to either fix or defer (in good conscious) any > > > outstanding tickets. > > > > > > As for the Release Plan, we can continue to amend the B3 page. When > > > we're ready for R1, make the final revisions and re-post it under a new > > > name. Since everything should be done by then, the freeze date can be > > > set for +(72 hours), to coincide with the close of the vote. > > > > > > At this point, I just don't have any more blood to shed for 1.1. If we > > > can't get this thing out the door in February, then we should look for > > > some more comitters who can. > > > > > > Either way, come March, I say it's time to get a fresh, > > > test-first-design start on 2.x. A year of FUD is more than enough. > > > > > > -Ted. > > > > > > Martin Cooper wrote: > > > > Ted had suggested that we resolve the outstanding items first, and > >then > > > > put together a release plan, complete with tag date. See: > > > > > > > > > >http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED] a > >che.org&msgId=612913 > > > > > > > > However, I don't believe that's working. In fact, as I believe Ted > >himself > > > > said of the 1.1-b3 drive, having a date to aim for is a better > >motivator. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, as I mentioned before, I don't have much time to help > >kill > > > > outstanding bug reports for RC1, due to current "day job" pressures. > >It'd > > > > be great to see an RC1 on or around Feb 14th, and I can do the RM > >thing, > > > > but I'm going to have to rely on others of you to get us ready for > >that. > > > > > > > > > > > >>Also, what is the status of the idea of separating the contrib > >libraries > > > >>out of the release? I'm not certain what the result was of any vote > >on > > > >>this, but I had the impression there wasn't enough response to make a > > > >>decision. > > > > > > > > > > > > IMO, Struts-EL should stay put until we get Struts 1.1 out the door. > >After > > > > that, we can discuss how to incorporate contrib code into the release > >as > > > > part of a broader discussion of how to factor distributions. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Ted Husted, > > > Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html> > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
