I think David meant dependencies only.

--
James Mitchell





----- Original Message -----
From: "Vic Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: exit stratefy was Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft deadline


>
> You said:
> "until 2.0 - no filters, el".
>
> My assumption was that html-el would ship in 1.2, but you said no el
> until 2.0. I asked has this been decided, becuase I missed it.
> Either way, I think html-el should be in 1.2!
>
> .V
>
>
> David Graham wrote:
> > What do you mean by HTML-EL?  We have Struts-EL in the contrib directory
> > that mirrors the html taglib except with el support.
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> >> From: "Vic Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Subject: Re: exit stratefy was Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft
deadline
> >> Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:35:57 -0500
> >>
> >> No HTML-EL in 1.2?
> >> Is that final?
> >>
> >> .V
> >>
> >> "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> > The templates taglib is already deprecated.  We won't move the base
> >> servlet
> >> > spec to 2.3 until 2.0 which means no filters, el, or jstl
dependencies.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the suggestions.
> >> > David
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >From: "Vic Cekvenich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >Subject: exit stratefy was  Plans for the upcoming 2/14 soft
deadline
> >> > >Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:13:45 -0500
> >> > >
> >> > >If I can say ....
> >> > >Please consider releasing nightly build (w/o EL) very, very soon, as
a
> >> RC1;
> >> > >+ plus a note of the know bugs.
> >> > >(I know it's not ideal, but it's an *exit* strategy).
> >> > >As soon as the bugs are fixed, release.
> >> > >Of course if something *new* shows up in RC1, then have RC2.
> >> > >
> >> > >At this point I would rather have 1.1a if something new shows up;
> >> other
> >> > >Jakarta projects have.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >Note: I plant to try to take basicPortal.com to Jakarta incubator,
> >> very
> >> > >soon, coments welcome.
> >> > >
> >> > >And if anyone wants to contribute to an online class (people only
pay
> >> > >"WebEx" charges), coming up very soon.
> >> > >
> >> > >vc at  basebeans.com
> >> > >
> >> > >Then my 1.2 wishlist (Craig?)
> >> > >-  HTML-el
> >> > >-  ship with JSTL (Maven?)
> >> > >- deprecate templates
> >> > >- deprecate (means will be gone after 2.0) beans tag (so people can
> >> use
> >> > >core
> >> > >tag)
> >> > >- split struts jar in 2. One for tags(and nested), one for rest.
> >> (So one
> >> > >day
> >> > >Struts could move most it's tags to jakarta.taglibs. Thus people can
> >> render
> >> > >anyway they want, ex: Faces tag)
> >> > >- include simple version of Scafolding BaseAction (w/ default
> >> disptach)
> >> and
> >> > >BaseFormBean (w/ beantuils to copy multirow) - This hints people in
a
> >> good
> >> > >direction.
> >> > >- better tiles and login example (Container based security)
> >> > >- filters? listeners?
> >> > >- please include struts-menu by S. Skyles (in strutstags.jar), it is
> >> > >popular
> >> > >as any tag and singe point for navigations.
> >> > >- faces "extension"
> >> > >- multi row example app in contrib ?
> >> > >- master/detail example app in contrib ?
> >> > >- Servlet 2.3
> >> > >(be glad to do half of any of above)
> >> > >
> >> > >Past 2.0 wish list:
> >> > >- Axis controller
> >> > >- Commons-SQL or Castor  (or RowSet) example app w/Struts.
> >> > >- DAO interface/factory (in Commons?)
> >> > >- Deprecate most tags (let people use taglibs for render,or
> >> Velocity, or
> >> > >faces....) but support JSP 2.0 in this release (HTML-EL, Faces,
Tiles,
> >> > >Validator only; no logic, etc. support)
> >> > >- XML "generator". Have you used JasperReports? "He" create an XML
> >> file
> >> > >that
> >> > >"compiles" to something else. So if we create a XML file (with
bands?)
> >> that
> >> > >"compiles" to JSP and struts.config, ,etc.? Then others can write
XML
> >> > >generators for any output. Of course, base extension classes behind.
> >> > >- JDK1.4 required
> >> > >- Servlet 2.4
> >> > >- There were a lot of 2.0 ideas.... I can't recall them.
> >> > >
> >> > >It is more exciting past 1.1.
> >> > >
> >> > >.V
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >"Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> > > > I would agree with Craig that dates are good motivators for
cutting
> >> > > > betas, but to cut a Release Candidate, logically, we need to be
> >> > > > release-ready. The objective release-ready test is what shows up
in
> >> > > > Bugzilla. So, someone has to either fix or defer (in good
> >> conscious)
> >> any
> >> > > > outstanding tickets.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > As for the Release Plan, we can continue to amend the B3 page.
When
> >> > > > we're ready for R1, make the final revisions and re-post it under
a
> >> new
> >> > > > name. Since everything should be done by then, the freeze date
> >> can be
> >> > > > set for +(72 hours), to coincide with the close of the vote.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > At this point, I just don't have any more blood to shed for 1.1.
> >> If we
> >> > > > can't get this thing out the door in February, then we should
> >> look for
> >> > > > some more comitters who can.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Either way, come March, I say it's time to get a fresh,
> >> > > > test-first-design start on 2.x. A year of FUD is more than
enough.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Ted.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Martin Cooper wrote:
> >> > > > > Ted had suggested that we resolve the outstanding items first,
> >> and
> >> > >then
> >> > > > > put together a release plan, complete with tag date. See:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> >
> >>
>http://archives.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> a
> >> > >che.org&msgId=612913
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > However, I don't believe that's working. In fact, as I believe
> >> Ted
> >> > >himself
> >> > > > > said of the 1.1-b3 drive, having a date to aim for is a better
> >> > >motivator.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Unfortunately, as I mentioned before, I don't have much time
> >> to help
> >> > >kill
> >> > > > > outstanding bug reports for RC1, due to current "day job"
> >> pressures.
> >> > >It'd
> >> > > > > be great to see an RC1 on or around Feb 14th, and I can do the
RM
> >> > >thing,
> >> > > > > but I'm going to have to rely on others of you to get us ready
> >> for
> >> > >that.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >>Also, what is the status of the idea of separating the contrib
> >> > >libraries
> >> > > > >>out of the release?  I'm not certain what the result was of
> >> any vote
> >> > >on
> >> > > > >>this, but I had the impression there wasn't enough response to
> >> make
> >> a
> >> > > > >>decision.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > IMO, Struts-EL should stay put until we get Struts 1.1 out the
> >> door.
> >> > >After
> >> > > > > that, we can discuss how to incorporate contrib code into the
> >> release
> >> > >as
> >> > > > > part of a broader discussion of how to factor distributions.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Martin Cooper
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Ted Husted,
> >> > > > Struts in Action <http://husted.com/struts/book.html>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _________________________________________________________________
> >> > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> >> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to