On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Ted Husted wrote:
> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:49:36 -0500 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Bug 16108 - Why is ActionForm a base class rather than an > interface? > > It's a high priority for another milestone. It is not slated for the > current iteration. Though, when I did that, I didn't know if there would > be another RC, so I marked it ahead. But at this point, there's no > reason not to go ahead and do it this weekend. > > Just to clarify, we're simply docuementing the design rationale. There > are not any plans to change how the ActionForm works right now. > And you're really going to have to break both of my arms and/or kick me out of Struts development if you want ActionForm *ever* changed to an interface again -- in *any* future Struts release. I think it's an absolutely horrible idea, for reasons that have been documented way too many times to count. Craig McClanahan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
