On Mon, 2003-03-24 at 14:20, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:49:36 -0500 > > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Bug 16108 - Why is ActionForm a base class rather than an > > interface? > > > > It's a high priority for another milestone. It is not slated for the > > current iteration. Though, when I did that, I didn't know if there would > > be another RC, so I marked it ahead. But at this point, there's no > > reason not to go ahead and do it this weekend. > > > > Just to clarify, we're simply docuementing the design rationale. There > > are not any plans to change how the ActionForm works right now. > > > > And you're really going to have to break both of my arms and/or kick me > out of Struts development if you want ActionForm *ever* changed to an > interface again -- in *any* future Struts release. I think it's an > absolutely horrible idea, for reasons that have been documented way too > many times to count.
Come on Craig, tell us how you *really* feel....LOL!! > > Craig McClanahan > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- James Mitchell Software Developer/Struts Evangelist http://www.open-tools.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
