YOU DA MAN!!!

Brandon Goodin 

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 7:57 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 5:26 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 4:56 PM
> > To: 'Struts Developers List'
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
> > 
> > 
> > I'm not going to vote right now, because I'm trying to work 
> > through the
> > problems and see if I can get them fixed. Ted, how long do we 
> > have to find
> > fixes and still allow you enough time to get a release out?
> > 
> > If we take the 'name' row out of the bean-cookie.jsp test, then the
> > remainder of that test works fine on Tomcat 3.3.1. I propose 
> > to go ahead and
> > check that in unless I hear any objection.
> > 
> > Now I'm looking at the logic-compare.jsp problem.
> 
> OK, I have this one nailed. It has to do with the size of the 
> page being too
> big for Tomcat 3.3.1 to handle. I've split the page into two 
> by pulling out
> the numeric tests into a separate page, and both pages now 
> work. Again, I
> propose to check this in unless I hear any objection.
> 
> Now for the Tiles problems...

Fixed. Time to release RC2! :-)

--
Martin Cooper


> 
> --
> Martin Cooper
> 
> 
> > If anyone 
> > else has some
> > time to look into the problems, might I suggest looking at 
> > the Tiles-related
> > ones that Ted mentioned?
> > 
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 3:14 PM
> > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > Subject: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
> > > 
> > > 
> > > In final testing of RC2, some compatibility issues have 
> been found 
> > > between Tomcat 3.3.1 and the struts-exercise-taglib 
> > > application as well 
> > > as the tiles-documentation application.
> > > 
> > > Martin Cooper has been looking into the problems and has 
> > > found that for 
> > > the struts-exercise-taglibs cookie test, it is the
> > > 
> > >    <jsp:getProperty name="sess" property="name"/>
> > > 
> > > expression that is failing.
> > > 
> > > The <jsp:getProperty> tags earlier on the page succeeded. The only
> > > difference seems to be that the earlier ones all have setters 
> > > as well as 
> > > getters in the Tomcat CookieFacade class, whereas there is 
> > > only a getter 
> > > for 'name'. So this actually looks like some kind of 
> > > JSP/reflection bug, 
> > > not related to Struts. (The <bean:cookie> tag must have 
> > > worked, because 
> > > we know the <jsp:getProperty> tag is trying to access a cookie!)
> > > 
> > > Also, the (rather complex) comparison test is killing the JVM 
> > > when run 
> > > under TC3.
> > > 
> > > In the Tiles application, servlet exceptions are being noted. One 
> > > example is the extendedDefinitionTag page, but there may 
> be others.
> > > 
> > > Unless fixes to these problems are immediately forthcoming, 
> > I propose 
> > > that we document the issues and release Stuts 1.1 beta 5.
> > > 
> > > By getting this milestone out to the community, we would have 
> > > a better 
> > > chance of resolving the remaining issues so that we can go 
> > to Struts 
> > > 1.1. final as soon as possible
> > > 
> > > This proposal has my +1.
> > > 
> > > -Ted.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to