Way to pull one out in the clinch, guys!

What's that I smell in the air?  Could it be... A release candidate?

James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 10:10 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
> 
> 
> +1 to RC2
> 
> -James
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:57 PM
> To: 'Struts Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 5:26 PM
> > To: 'Struts Developers List'
> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 4:56 PM
> > > To: 'Struts Developers List'
> > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I'm not going to vote right now, because I'm trying to work
> > > through the
> > > problems and see if I can get them fixed. Ted, how long do we 
> > > have to find
> > > fixes and still allow you enough time to get a release out?
> > > 
> > > If we take the 'name' row out of the bean-cookie.jsp 
> test, then the 
> > > remainder of that test works fine on Tomcat 3.3.1. I 
> propose to go 
> > > ahead and check that in unless I hear any objection.
> > > 
> > > Now I'm looking at the logic-compare.jsp problem.
> > 
> > OK, I have this one nailed. It has to do with the size of the
> > page being too
> > big for Tomcat 3.3.1 to handle. I've split the page into two 
> > by pulling out
> > the numeric tests into a separate page, and both pages now 
> > work. Again, I
> > propose to check this in unless I hear any objection.
> > 
> > Now for the Tiles problems...
> 
> Fixed. Time to release RC2! :-)
> 
> --
> Martin Cooper
> 
> 
> > 
> > --
> > Martin Cooper
> > 
> > 
> > > If anyone
> > > else has some
> > > time to look into the problems, might I suggest looking at 
> > > the Tiles-related
> > > ones that Ted mentioned?
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Martin Cooper
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 3:14 PM
> > > > To: Struts Developers List
> > > > Subject: [VOTE] Convert RC2 to Beta 5
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > In final testing of RC2, some compatibility issues have
> > been found
> > > > between Tomcat 3.3.1 and the struts-exercise-taglib
> > > > application as well 
> > > > as the tiles-documentation application.
> > > > 
> > > > Martin Cooper has been looking into the problems and has
> > > > found that for 
> > > > the struts-exercise-taglibs cookie test, it is the
> > > > 
> > > >    <jsp:getProperty name="sess" property="name"/>
> > > > 
> > > > expression that is failing.
> > > > 
> > > > The <jsp:getProperty> tags earlier on the page 
> succeeded. The only 
> > > > difference seems to be that the earlier ones all have 
> setters as 
> > > > well as getters in the Tomcat CookieFacade class, 
> whereas there is
> > > > only a getter 
> > > > for 'name'. So this actually looks like some kind of 
> > > > JSP/reflection bug, 
> > > > not related to Struts. (The <bean:cookie> tag must have 
> > > > worked, because 
> > > > we know the <jsp:getProperty> tag is trying to access a cookie!)
> > > > 
> > > > Also, the (rather complex) comparison test is killing the JVM
> > > > when run 
> > > > under TC3.
> > > > 
> > > > In the Tiles application, servlet exceptions are being 
> noted. One
> > > > example is the extendedDefinitionTag page, but there may 
> > be others.
> > > > 
> > > > Unless fixes to these problems are immediately forthcoming,
> > > I propose
> > > > that we document the issues and release Stuts 1.1 beta 5.
> > > > 
> > > > By getting this milestone out to the community, we would have
> > > > a better 
> > > > chance of resolving the remaining issues so that we can go 
> > > to Struts
> > > > 1.1. final as soon as possible
> > > > 
> > > > This proposal has my +1.
> > > > 
> > > > -Ted.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to