Ted wrote: > If there were absolutely no CVS changes that we wanted to include in the > release, then, yes, we could just rename it. In this case, there were > some minor changes that we would want to include, so the final release > would be "rolled" again from CVS. But, I do not believe anyone is > anticipating a RC3. We do have the latitude to go to a final release > whenever we believe the codebase is "ready for prime time".
I mistyped, I meant RC2 there. I'm putting a Struts webapp into production this weekend and wondered whether the release candidate or the nightly would be "closer" to what ends up being 1.1 final. No way do I want to see RC3! I'm fortunate enough that the powers that be trust me when I say that the nightlies and release candidates are plenty stable enough to use in production, and really feel for those people who are still stuck on 1.0 until 1.1 final appears. :( -- Wendy Smoak Applications Systems Analyst, Sr. Arizona State University, PA, IRM
