Thanks, David. One of the things I think we need to look at with respect to the documentation and web site is the number of places in which we refer to specific version numbers, be they stable releases, milestones, or something else. Right now, we have no controlled way of dealing with this, which means that I always seem to miss at least one when I'm preparing for a new release.
I don't have any brilliant solutions for this at the moment, but I'll definitely be giving it some thought. -- Martin Cooper On Wed, 3 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21230>. > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21230 > > 1.0.2 still listed as current stable release > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > Resolution| |FIXED > > > > ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-03 01:58 ------- > Fixed. You will see the changes the next time the website is published. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
