On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, James Turner wrote:
> >David Graham wrote: > > The plan all along was that 1.2.0 would include a move to > > commons-resources and no other major changes. However, > > commons-resources is still in the sandbox so I suggest we > > postpone that move to the next release. I've committed all > > of my interesting changes for 1.2.0 so I'd like to hear the > > status on the nested and tiles bugs plus the one Martin has > > assigned to himself. Also, is the validwhen vaildation working? > > > > Well, validWhen is checked into the release, and it's the same code I'm > using on a live customer site, so my belief is that it is. We won't > know how well it works until more users try it out and find bugs, but > that's the nice thing about more frequent release cycles, right? I assume you mean that 'validWhen' is checked in to CVS, and that it's in the nightlies. It certainly isn't in a release at this point. One thing I would like to be absolutely clear on. More frequent releases absolutely does *not* mean lower quality releases, and does *not* mean moving the burden of quality assurance from the committers to the user base. The above statement regarding "the nice thing" about more frequent releases could be construed otherwise, so I felt a need to clearly state my own position. :-} -- Martin Cooper > > James > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
