On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Steve Raeburn wrote: > Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:51:17 -0700 > From: Steve Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: When is the next release? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: August 10, 2003 12:37 PM > > To: Struts Developers List > > Subject: Re: When is the next release? > > > > > > I'm a zero-relative guy at heart :-). My only concern is that people will > > assume 1.2.0 really means 1.2, but I'd be happy with either 1.2.0 or > > 1.2.1. > > > > Craig, could you clarify what you mean by 1.2? > > I would assume 1.2 == 1.2.x, i.e. 1.2 represents the series of 1.2.x > releases. > So 1.2 would represent the 1.2 interface, but 1.2.x would be a particular > implementation. >
Sorry, I should have been clearer. We had a final release called "1.1", and people who don't understand that we are changing processes might misinterpret "1.2.0" to be "1.2 final" even though it won't be. That is the only reason I mildly favor starting with 1.2.1, but I'd be happy with 1.2.0 as well -- we're going to have to do lots of explanations on how things work through at least the first two or three cycles no matter what the number is. > Steve Craig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
