Sun, 21 Mar 2004 13:49:45 -0500, Thomas L Roche (not speaking for IBM) >> summary: McClanahan should clearly state *in some major publication*
>> * that JSF does/will not "replace Struts" >> * how JSF and Struts will likely tend to specialize, in future >> * how probable specializations will complement (and compete) in >> webapp development Ted Husted Sun, 21 Mar 2004 20:28:17 -0500 > But I think either of us would rather be developing Struts than > evangelizing Struts. This is not about "evangelizing": it's about clarifying the relationship between 2 large parts of J2EE's future, and correcting some (apparently) false perceptions. Frankly, I'm perplexed why the propagation of the latter has gone unchecked for so long. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
