On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:07:55 +0000, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote:
In my experienc multiple CVS repositories can make a project much harder to manage. But are we singing from the same hymn sheet? Is a "multiple repository" equal ( or not equal) to a CVS module?
We mean multiple CVS modules. The original idea being each module would generate a jar. Product==JAR==Module==unit-of-release.
One list of potential products -- each with its own JAR, module, and release cycle -- would be:
* core (including tiles and validator) * examples * site * whiteboard (or "sandbox")
* opt-taglib * opt-el * opt-faces
aka "the seven dwarfs" :)
Now it clearer.
Well this is how Expresso CVS is laid out and an old investment bank project which I was involved in a couple years ago was laid out like that as well.
I guess the hard part of copying jar and build a web app from CVS modules have already been discussed. Still it is the only way to go if you want to Struts to be modular. So +1 from me.
--
Peter Pilgrim
__ _____ _____ _____
/ //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java
/ /___/ // /__ / /__ + Struts
/ // ___// ___// ___/ + Expresso Committer
__/ // /__ / /__ / /__ + Independent Contractor
/___//____//____//____/ + Intrinsic Motivation
On Line Resume
||
\\===> `` http://www.xenonsoft.demon.co.uk/no-it-striker.html ''--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
