Actually, let me correct that last post...the %>s at the end of each
logic:present tag are NOT in my JSP.  That was a typo on my part when I was
putting it into the e-mail.

Sorry.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rg]On Behalf Of Greg Maletic
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 4:29 PM
To: Martin Cooper; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Form processing question


That was my idea, too, but it doesn't seem to work.  I'm doing the
following:

<logic:present parameter="productId" %>
        <html:form action="editProductConfirmed.do">
</logic:present>
<logic:notPresent parameter="productId" %>
        <html:form action="addProductConfirmed.do">
</logic:present>


But the parser goes nuts with this.  XML doesn't allow improperly nested
tags, so it complains that there's no matching </html:form> tag inside of
the <logic:present> tag.

Does anyone have any other ideas?

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2001 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Form processing question


One way to do this would be to use the Struts conditional tags to generate a
different URL on the page for edit versus add. You could base the decision
on the presence or absence of your productId parameter.

--
Martin Cooper


----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Maletic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 5:09 PM
Subject: Form processing question


> I have a JSP that is used to edit data on a ActionForm bean.  There are
two
> ways for users to reach this JSP:  1) if they're adding a new object into
my
> app; 2) if they're editing an existing object in my app.  I'm using two
> mappings in my struts-config.xml file to represent these two types of
> actions ("/add" and "/edit"), although they both map to this same JSP.
> (Additionally, the "/edit" mapping has a parameter called "productId" that
> describes which product to edit, while the "/add" mapping doesn't have a
> parameter.)
>
> It's the behavior when the JSP's form is submitted that I'm having trouble
> with.  If the JSP was reached through the "add" mapping, I want it to go
to
> an "/addExecute" mapping that will actually add the object.  And if the
JSP
> was reached through the "edit" mapping, I want the form to go to an
> "/editExecute" mapping that will actually make the modifications to the
> object.  (As above, the "/editExecute" mapping needs a "productId"
parameter
> specified--passed through from the original "/edit" mapping--while the
> "/addExecute" mapping doesn't.)  Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to
> conditionally make the form submit to one of two different actions
> ("/addExecute" or "/editExecute").
>
> Is there a way to make this work?  Is this the right technique for solving
> this problem?  If not, could someone please let me know how this is
> typically done?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
>




Reply via email to