Not really. It's a whopping class, and it's only really become an issue with JSP's, because people can throw in so much content, tags etc.
Arron. Joseph Barefoot wrote: >Is this really such a bad thing? If someone is writing java classes that >compile to >64K, I think they may need to revisit their object-oriented >principles. ;) > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Malcolm Dew-Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:19 PM >>To: Struts Users Mailing List >>Subject: Re: jsp size limit? >> >> >> >> >> >>On Thu, 9 May 2002, Arron Bates wrote: >> >>>There's a limitation on the size of a compliled Java class. Java has >>>this arbitrary limit of 62k for a compiled class. Looks like you're >>> >>In 1986 Macintosh computers had the same 64K code barrier. Compiled units >>of code had to be split into chunks that were smaller than 64K, and linked >>together. >> >>I guess Java isn't really such a modern language after all. >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
