True. 'Course, that begs the question: how much content should you really have on a single page?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 5:25 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: jsp size limit? > > > Not really. It's a whopping class, and it's only really become an issue > with JSP's, because people can throw in so much content, tags etc. > > Arron. > > Joseph Barefoot wrote: > > >Is this really such a bad thing? If someone is writing java classes that > >compile to >64K, I think they may need to revisit their object-oriented > >principles. ;) > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Malcolm Dew-Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:19 PM > >>To: Struts Users Mailing List > >>Subject: Re: jsp size limit? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>On Thu, 9 May 2002, Arron Bates wrote: > >> > >>>There's a limitation on the size of a compliled Java class. Java has > >>>this arbitrary limit of 62k for a compiled class. Looks like you're > >>> > >>In 1986 Macintosh computers had the same 64K code barrier. > Compiled units > >>of code had to be split into chunks that were smaller than 64K, > and linked > >>together. > >> > >>I guess Java isn't really such a modern language after all. > >> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
