He'll get better. > -----Original Message----- > From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 1:10 PM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: Auto-Replies > > > Could we turn him into a newt? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 2:02 PM > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: Auto-Replies > > > > > On Fri, 10 May 2002, Eddie Bush wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 12:29:33 -0500 > > From: Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Auto-Replies > > > > Suggestion: > > > > Why don't we remove people from the list that generate auto-reply > messages? > > > > In general, I try to do just that on things like vacation replies. > However, it's not always an issue of removing direct > subscribers -- and > the recent "temporarily exceeded quota" situation going on now is an > example. > > There is no subscriber to STRUTS-USER that has > "sprintpcs.com" in their > subscription address (hardly a surprise, given the volume of > messages :-). > This particular message is coming from some existing > subscriber that is > forwarding their own mailbox -- and there is no clue in the reply back > from Sprint on who the guilty party is. > > Craig > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
