This is really a question, since I'm not familiar with the details of how DynaBretheren pull off their magic.
To what extent does reliance on DynaActionForm beans tie the view impl to using Struts tags? Does using DynaStuff require that tags use the commons introspection utils? Specifically, would a JSTL-based set of tags see Dyna properties as regular properties? If DynaActionForms don't trick the regular introspection mechanisms into thinking they have javabean properties, then I would consider that a major disadvantage. JSTL is compelling... <totally-unrelated-question-for-Craig> Regarding cool tag developments, if Craig is reading this, is there any info you can share about JSR 127? I know your team's working hard on it now. One question I have in particular (if I may :-) is that it seems a framework using Faces would have controller logic interacting with these gui components/widgets. Given that none of the servlet frameworks were built with Faces in mind, upon its release will any of our favorite frameworks be able to use it without major refactoring? ...ok, I have lots of other questions, but will go back to pretending to wait paitiently like everybody else. </totally-unrelated-question-for-Craig>
