Another approach it to use JSTL tags: The Standard/Core tags have an X:Transform tag. Example: basicPortal.sf.net (a sample Struts app) stores XML in a DB Content table, and then uses the X tag to outputs and XSLT.
V. "Jerry Jalenak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I've just started looking at using XML/XSLT as the 'view' component for our > web apps. I like Stxx and it's integration with struts. Has anyone > successfully integrated the 'experimental' Stxx 1.1 version with Struts > 1.1b2? It looks like the folks over at Openroad aren't spending alot of > time to bring Stxx up to Struts 1.1 compatibility. Also, can anyone explain > why they integrated it as a sub-app and not a plug-in? It seems that Stxx > would (could?) work just like tiles or validator...... > > > Jerry > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:48 PM > > To: Struts Users Mailing List > > Subject: Re: Struts - vs XSLT (ASP.NET v. Struts) > > > > > > As alluded, the stxx extension does a nice job of this by integrating > > with Struts. Though, I'd say the idea of a completely > > seperate servlet > > (a la Velocity) sounds cleaner. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/resources/views.html > > > > The Expresso/Struts framework also supports XML/XSL directly. > > > > http://www.jcorporate.com/ > > > > XML/XSL is going to win out in the long-run, but we're all still > > transitioning. To date, the major complaint has been > > performance, but, > > as mentioned, the new parsers are addressing that. > > > > A speed-optimized servlet that used an external configuration file to > > specify the stylesheets (a la stxx) would be a definite winner. > > Especially if it could be used with or without Struts (like > > Velocity and > > JSPs). > > > > -Ted. > > > > neal wrote: > > > > > Alright, so if the purpose of Struts and ASP.NET is: > > > > > > 1. To seperate code from content > > > 2. Make the presentation layer completely declarative > > > > > > The why not just write a servlet that instead for forward > > to display JSPs, > > > looks up a different XSLT for display based upon the action > > class being > > > requested ... and instead of having to pass all your data to the > > > presentation servlet in beans ... you just transform your > > XML data using > > > that XSLT. Seems to achieve the same goals and > > architecturally removes a > > > layer if you're going to use XML at all. (Just servlet and > > XSL instead of > > > Servlet, JSP, and XSL). > > > > > > ?????? > > > > > > Any thoughts?? > > > Neal > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY US > > co-author, Java Web Development with Struts > > Order it today: > > <http://husted.com/struts/book.html> > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > This transmission (and any information attached to it) may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the transmission to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this transmission in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify LabOne at (800)388-4675. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
