Andy:

Just to second what Dave said:

I reluctantly switched over to 1.12b a month or so ago.  I was reluctant
because I am in the middle of learning Struts and converting an existing
app over to it, and I had enough to handle without worrying about the
changes between 1.02 and 1.1.

I switched, finally, because my reading proved that there were a number
of new features that I could not ignore.  If I did, I was going to have
to code them -- with difficulty -- to 1.02 functionality, only to then
turn around and re-code them very easily to new 1.1 capabilities.

First and most importantly, the switch caused *NO* errors.  I simply
replaced the Struts version and everything still worked.  I then started
implementing the new features as I needed them.  I replaced deprecated
method calls where it was easy and where it made sense; others I left
alone for the foreseeable future.  When I get everything working, I'll
go back and make a cleanup pass, removing calls to deprecated methods.

The validator and declarative exception handling alone are worth the
price of admission.  I haven't even touched DynaForms yet, which I know
is a big new capability and very worthwhile.  Other worthwhile new stuff
abounds; use what you need and ignore the rest until you do need it.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 1.1 release date?


I understand not wanting to use a beta version but it has really worked
well 
for me.  All the stuff I was using in 1.0.2 still works and the new
stuff 
I've tried works as well (plugins, map backed form fields, exception 
handling).

Dave


>From: Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: 1.1 release date?
>Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 10:54:52 -0500
>
>Well said, David!
>
>While there is no date set, there are bugs to be squashed.  If you find
>yourself able to contribute patches to fix things that are wrong, you
will 
>be able to "hurry" the final release ;-)  These Jakarta folk don't
release 
>on a time-line, but, instead, on a merit-line.  When the software is 
>decided to be "worthy of the Jakarta name", it will be stamped final -
not 
>before.
>
>Craig said at some point in the past how final releases are just 
>nightly
>builds that "the developers think have been tested enough" (that's a 
>misquote, but you get the jist).
>
>Hop right in and put your heel down on a bug or two!  That's the best 
>way
>you can ensure a quicker release :-D
>
>If you're close to release and don't feel secure using the 1.1 
>code-base,
>by all means, use 1.0.2.  If you're not so close to release, probably
1.1 
>would be best.  In the end, it's a judgement call only you can make ;-)

>Have you actually tried a nightly build?  There's a *lot* of added 
>functionality there.  If you're on a container adhering to jsp 
>specification 1.2, the addition of the Struts-EL taglib could save you
a 
>lot of hassle!
>
>David Graham wrote:
>
>>no
>>
>>>From: "Andy Kriger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" 
>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Subject: 1.1 release date?
>>>Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:20:08 -0400
>>>
>>>I am interested in using Struts 1.1 for an upcoming project because 
>>>of
>>>the
>>>added features (especially validation). However, I don't want to use
beta
>>>software in a production release. Is there a target date for 1.1rel?
>>>
>>>thx
>>>andy
>>
>
>--
>Eddie Bush
>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to