So, I've been following this thread, but I'm a bit confused on how you 
would access the ArrayList of beans from the Action (assuming a DynaForm 
implementation).  Which method of PropertyUtils or BeanUtils should be 
used if any?



Taylor, Jason wrote:

>Yeah, I've done this stuff a fair bit.  You definitely need 1.1 because the
>"indexed" attribute has been added to the <html:xxx> tags and the nested
>extension has been folded into the core distribution.
>
>You can definitely declare an array or ArrayList of objects as a
>form-property of a DynaActionForm.  The objects in the lists I use are
>regular beans with getter/setters since I haven't gotten around to figuring
>out how to nest DynaActionForms in such a way as to have the controller
>handle population for me.  Anyway, it definitely works with the custom beans
>I define as ad hoc classes-- the controller can populate any bean so long as
>it can find the class that defines it.  
>
>You define the form elements on the JSP doing the submission using
>logic:iterate and the "indexed" attribute of your <html:xxx/> tags.  My rule
>is to use indexed tags with one dimension of arbitrary length and nested
>with more than that and never both-- noone to my knowledge has yet
>contradicted me in this forum so I think it's reasonably good rule of thumb.
>
>
>In general, this approach is *way* better than parsing the request
>attributes in your code.  Let me know if I'm not clear-- it is after all
>Friday-- but anyway it's totally do-able.
>
>The problem I've had is with elements like checkboxes that require some
>activity in the reset() method.  Since you're building an array dynamically
>from the DB you have to work out some strategy for handling exceptions that
>leave your form less than totally initialized.  I'm thinking I could do
>something with declarative exceptions, but again I haven't gotten around to
>it.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:28 AM
>To: Struts Users Mailing List
>Subject: RE: Design Problem: Multiple Object Update
>
>
>you still need to declare your variables in the config file eith a
>DynaActionForm.  This form is dependent on whats in the db at that time.
>
>does any one else have any suggestions for this design issue?
>
>thanks,
>mark
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:27 AM
>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>Subject: RE: Design Problem: Multiple Object Update
>
>
>Oh...have you looked into DynaActionForm?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 1:22 PM
>To: Struts Users Mailing List
>Subject: RE: Design Problem: Multiple Object Update
>
>
>Mark,
>
>I dont think you really read my email before responding.  I understand the
>importance of the Form Action Paradigm, and why it exisits.  I am using it
>in most places in my application.  
>
>In this particular form, I have a list of objects, with multiple attributes.
>Each attribute name is preceded by the objects id.  this list is dynamically
>created, so i would not know how to create the form beforehand.  I was
>wondering if there was some struts feature that could help me with the
>semi-common wbe form problem.
>
>any ideas?
>
>thanks,
>mark s.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:19 AM
>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>Subject: RE: Design Problem: Multiple Object Update
>
>
>I was only suggesting upgrading.  By bypassing the ActionForm you do not
>allow Struts to do what it does best - set the state of a bean with values
>gathered from an HTML form upon submit.  Your users are not really updating
>dynamically - that would mean in real time.  They are inputting values into
>a form and then submitting the form.  If you have an Action class and
>ActionForm declared and mapped in struts-config.xml, Struts will set the
>state of all associated variables in the ActionForm (JavaBean)
>automatically.  Then you can use the associated Action class to do whatever
>you want with the values - store in a database, pass to another action,
>return to the user for verification, etc.
>
>Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 12:52 PM
>
>How will upgrading to 1.1b2 help me here?  does it provide some feature that
>does what i need?  i cannot seem to find it.
>
>i understand i shouldn't bypass the form, but HOW can i avoid it since these
>are all dynamically created inputs based on an id list?
>
>thanks,
>mark
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Galbreath, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 4:29 AM
>To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
>Subject: RE: Design Problem: Multiple Object Update
>
>
>a.  upgrade to 1.1b2
>b.  don't bypass the ActionForm
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 8:40 PM
>To: Struts Users Mailing List
>Subject: Design Problem: Multiple Object Update
>
>
>How would you strut gurus approach this in a Struts oriented way 
>
>( I am currently using Struts 1.0.2)
>
>I have a list of objects on the screen, and i want to be able to make mass
>updates to.  For example, i have a list of users, with Various Attributes
>(name, isActive checkbox, etc). 
>
>I want the user to be able to make edits on the whole screen, and then
>submit it.  What is the best way to keep the data together in terms of
>naming of the fields.  currently I precede each value with the userId and an
>underscore.
>
>User = Mark Silva
>userId = 101
>
>name field --> 101_name
>isActiveField --> 101_isActive
>
>
>then to get all the data, i have to parse through the parameter list in the
>request, and piece this all together.  Notice I am bypassing the Form
>object.
>
>Is there a Struts way to do this?
>
>thanks,
>Mark
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>  
>

-- 
Angie Lin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
408.519.9250



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to