Read up on
http://radio.weblogs.com/0107789/stories/2002/05/24/isEjbAlwaysNecessary.html
and 4 links here
www.basebeans.com/bad.jsp
and
on serverside:
   Java Data Objects vs. Entity Beans
  Microsoft claims.NET version of Java Petstore is superior
  Meta Group: J2EE Complexity Holding Back Platform Adoption
http://www2.theserverside.com/home/thread.jsp?thread_id=15802&article_count=69

I found on high performance sites EJB was much slower in practices than 
roll your own DAO, and clients tend to remove them. EJB are marketed as 
fast, but I found them slower and expensive. I also tend to find mostly 
new Java Developers want use EJB.

Yes you can use EJB, anyone can, just like any kid in High School can 
build a web site. I see a role of a Software Enginer to find a way to 
use less time and less resources in developing/operating a web app.

So now if Clients only want high perofrmance persistance (and no need 
for Corba, etc.) I use DAO. I just tried to make it one sentence. 
Clients are happy to save money anytime, they love high ROI margin, low 
cost per transaction.

.V


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>>Another spin is:
>>Do not use EJB for persistance.
> 
> 
> Not sure if I understand this one, Vic. I use Entity beans a lot to manage
> persistence. Am I missing a point?
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use
> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> information that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from
> disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that
> any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
> strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
> please notify the sender and erase this e-mail message immediately.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------




--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to