Geez...I'm losing it.  I've been staring at the computer screen for too many
hours this week.  Time to pop open a Budweiser and get away from all this
*exciting* stuff for a while.

Thanks again,

JOHN

-----Original Message----- 
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 8:51 PM 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: Struts-el NOT working with Struts 1.1 RC1 Release



I haven't contributed to Struts-EL, that's David Karr.  I was pointing out 
that you should download a recent nightly to get the fixes you need.  
There's nothing terribly special about RC1 vs. the nightly that came the day

after RC1 was released. 

David *Graham* :-) 




>From: "Hohlen, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>Subject: RE: Struts-el NOT working with Struts 1.1 RC1 Release 
>Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:47:00 -0600 
> 
>David, 
> 
>      First, sorry for the miscommunication.  I put the word valuable in 
>quotes to emphasize it's usefulness, not sarcasm.  If I doubted it's 
>usefulness, I would have done something like this: valuable? 
>      I guess I should use asterisks next time. 
>      Personally, I'm under the impression that a "RC" release is more than

>just a regular nightly build.  From the Jakarta News page: 
> 
>       "The Struts Team believes that this release is ready for prime time,

>hence its designation as a release candidate." 
> 
>     From the "Binaries" page: 
> 
>     "Nightly Builds are those that are very unstable (a.k.a. dynamite!). 
>We 
>have no confidence in them. They are for developers who are helping to 
>develop the technology and want "the latest bits." Use at your own risk!" 
> 
>     Obviously, every product is the result of a nightly build (final or 
>not).   I don't really want to get into a debate over "release" semantics. 
>I realize "Struts-EL" has only been released under the category of 
>"nightly".  Since it's so tightly coupled with Struts, I just thought it 
>would be nice if there was a compatible version for RC1.  I'm not saying it

>has to be bug-free, but at least JSP code generation error free (i.e. the 
>JSP doesn't blow up during the code generation process -- as these are easy

>to detect, almost impossible to workaround.).   I'm just trying to help 
>out. 
>Not trying to start any type of personal war. 
> 
>Thanks again for all your contributions to Struts-EL, 
> 
>JOHN 
> 
>-----Original Message----- 
>From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] 
>Sent: Fri 2/28/2003 8:05 PM 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Cc: 
>Subject: RE: Struts-el NOT working with Struts 1.1 RC1 Release 
> 
> 
> 
>I don't understand.  You say that David fixed the problem but you're still 
>unhappy?  RC1 != 1.1 final.  There will be bugs until the final version. 
>You say that using nightlies is risky but you're using RC1 (which is a 
>nightly)!  Furthermore, Struts-EL is still in the contrib folder which 
>gives 
> 
>it a different status than the standard code base. 
> 
>FYI, putting a word in quotes normally implies sarcasm. 
> 
>David 
> 
> 
> 
> >From: "Hohlen, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >To: Struts Users Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >Subject: RE: Struts-el NOT working with Struts 1.1 RC1 Release 
> >Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:54:45 -0600 
> > 
> >David Karr said he fixed this problem in last night's Struts-EL build. 
> >This 
> >means in order to pick up the fix, you have to migrate from the RC1 
>version 
> 
> >of Struts to a nightly build version (due to other changes made to the 
> >regular Struts tags since the RC1 release -- otherwise you'll have 
> >incompatability issues -- I think).  Many projects are reluctant to use 
> >nightly builds (for obvious reasons).  Therefore, this hurts the overall 
> >likelihood of other projects incorporating Struts-EL.   I would think 
>that 
> >the Struts-EL team would want to provide a version of their project 
>that's 
> >compatible with RC1.  This will allow for wider user base which would be 
> >good for the overall project.  Doesn't this make sense or am I missing 
> >something? 
> > 
> >Thanks, 
> > 
> >JOHN 
> > 
> >P.S. I had these same problems with the beta 3 release.  My development 
> >team 
> >is getting frustrated to the point that they're almost ready to punt with

> >Struts-EL.  No offense to the developers of Struts-EL.  We really 
> >appreciate 
> >all the hard work you've put into this "valuable" subproject.  We're just

> >starting to get behind schedule and need some stability. 
> >P.S.S. How come others aren't complaining about this?  Are we the only 
> >one's 
> >trying to Struts-EL with RC1?? 
> > 
> >-----Original Message----- 
> >From: Hohlen, John 
> >Sent: Thu 2/27/2003 7:50 AM 
> >To: Struts-User (E-mail) 
> >Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
> >Subject: Struts-el NOT working with Struts 1.1 RC1 Release 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >Is anyone able to use the Struts-EL subproject with the Struts 1.1 RC1 
> >release?  I'm encountering the following error using the "struts-el.jar" 
> >from the "contrib" folder in the RC1 release: 
> > 
> >/jsp/login/loginTile.jsp(12): Error in using tag library 
> >uri='/WEB-INF/struts-html-el.tld' prefix='html-el': The Tag class 
> >'org.apache.strutsel.taglib.html.ELImgTag' has no setter method 
> >corresponding to TLD declared attribute 'onkeypress', (JSP 1.1 spec, 
>5.4.1) 
> 
> >I'm currently using WebLogic 6.1 SP 2.  I encountered problems similar to

> >this when the beta 3 release first came out.  It wasn't until about a 
>week 
> >later that the Struts-EL project would work with the beta 3 release (for 
>me 
> 
> >at least). 
> >Thanks, 
> >JOHN 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > 
> > 
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
>_________________________________________________________________ 
>The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
<http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail>  
><http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
<http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail> > 
> 
> 
>--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> 
>--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


_________________________________________________________________ 
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
<http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963>  


--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to