That's fine if, of course, you subscribe to the school of thought
prescribing a pre-code test (which I do not).

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Vic Cekvenic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [POLL] ActionFrom vs DynaActionForm


+1 ActionForms.

On of the benefits of Modular/MVC programing is that you can unit test a
  module, before integrating it.

.V

Andrew Hill wrote:
> Call me old fashioned but I always use good old hand coded ActionForms.
> Guess I like having something my compiler can get its teeth into. :-)
>
> Now that Im using Eclipse getters and setters are no problem at all. I
love
> that generate getter & setter menu option.  :-)
>
> (Validation isnt an issue for me either way as Ive always found it more
> convenient to do in the Action)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mainguy, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 1 October 2003 00:52
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [POLL] ActionFrom vs DynaActionForm
>
>
> Next in my series of struts-user polls (please complain if this gets old).
>
> What sort of ActionForms does everyone use?
>
> #1 ActionForm
> #2 DynaActionForm
>
> Personally, I'm an advocate of the DynaActionForm as it seems to be able
to
> do 80-90% of everything I need to do and everything else can be done in my
> business tier.  I have, however, run into another person who is dead set
> against using it.  His rationale is that you are then unable to do custom
> validation when you use the DynaValidatorForm...  I think you can still do
> it, it's just a little more difficult, but, I'm polling to see if I'm out
in
> left field...
>
>
>
> This message and its contents (to include attachments) are the property of
> Kmart Corporation (Kmart) and may contain confidential and proprietary
> information. You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or
> distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on
> information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized use of
> information contained herein may subject you to civil and criminal
> prosecution and penalties. If you are not the intended recipient, you
should
> delete this message immediately.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to