"the only reason I posted that msg was for baiting purposes" Look, I just don't think that is helpful to anyone. If you are deliberately saying stuff in order to bait people into a reaction then IMHO this is the wrong place to do it. I also think that stating this on the list is a valid enough place to state this. People responded to your comment in order to advise others that they thought your assessment of JBoss was incorrect. If it is your true assessment, fair enough, but you refused to back it up when asked to, and replied that your comment was just to bait people.
I'm not going to labor the point anymore. No offence meant at all, and sorry if any was caused. I find this list exceptionally helpful and pleasant. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2003 11:36 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat Apparently more than 20 people believed it was important enough to spark a discussion of the issue, so if it was a waste of your time, perhaps you are just too important for this list? As far as bad advice goes, most of the people I know in the *real* world agree with my assessment: JBoss is not worth the trouble. In short, it's crap. Oh yeah...and thanks for the waste of bandwidth with your useless msg; next time, practice what you supposedly believe and email your criticism privately. Marko Sharko -----Original Message----- From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:19 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat Well congrats on a) wasting other people's time b) giving bad advice perhaps you should consider fishing elsewhere. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 October 2003 10:51 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat Yeah, but the only reason I posted that msg was for baiting purposes...and apparently I caught a lot of fish... ;-P Mark -----Original Message----- From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 9:37 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat I agree, but I was responding to your "jboss is crap" statement, which also has little to do with entity beans. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 October 2003 11:41 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat That's an improvement, but really has little to do with EJB entity beans. -----Original Message----- From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 8:33 AM To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat Can't really agree with that. Besides, jboss have just employed the creator of hibernate and its CMP layer is going to be powered by hibernate in the near future anyway. So if you're a fan of hibernate, you'll get the same thing under the hood with jboss and CMP ejbs. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 October 2003 11:08 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat JBoss is crap, anyway. -----Original Message----- From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:44 AM This isn't the case for jboss at least. You gain major performance increases. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 October 2003 10:35 Yes, the advantage of using local interfaces in EJBs is avoiding the creation of stubs and skeletons, use of RMI and serialization. But what many people don't realize is that all the major containers have been doing this since 1.1 anyway, abeit in proprietary ways. You really gain no performance advantage by explicitly declaring an EJB interface local - you merely adhere to the specification. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Kunal H. Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 8:20 PM The CMP2.x spec allows declaring EJBs as local objects. The advantage of the local EJB objects is that they don't get serialized/deserialized(I think) and pass-by-reference and not by-value. Effectively, If you use a LocalEJB, you have the flexibitly of making the REMOTE with very few changes to code. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
