On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IIUC, Clisp has two CLX implementations; one via xlib and the other > native. Which are you using?
new-clx, as recommended at http://stumpwm.antidesktop.net/cgi-bin/wiki/Compiling_CLISP . I've always found the "old" mit-clx implementation to be superior in many ways: 1. reliable 2. robust 3. stable Whereas new-clx has always caused problems here. YMMV. Xavier -- http://www.gnu.org http://www.april.org http://www.lolica.org _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
