Michael Raskin <38a93...@rambler.ru> writes: > Shawn Betts wrote: >>>> I like the sound of this: simple but effective. >>> With our pace of the last years we don't even need to do anything >>> special.. We should just ask people to report all regressions in git >>> head "right now" and wait for a week without commits and without >>> reports to handle left - it will come soon afterwards anyway.. >> >> That's how I've done it in the past. It works... > > Well, the idea is to make it more frequent.
Okay. Then let's keep the current model and just do the releases more often. ;) On a related matter: What about an 1.0 release in the mid-term future? What would be _your_ wishlist for StumpWM 1.0? Regards, -- Julian Stecklina The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners - Ernst Jan Plugge _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
