On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:30 +0200, Lionel Flandrin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 02:03:35PM +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote: > > Michael Raskin <38a93...@rambler.ru> writes: > > > > > Shawn Betts wrote: > > >>>> I like the sound of this: simple but effective. > > >>> With our pace of the last years we don't even need to do anything > > >>> special.. We should just ask people to report all regressions in git > > >>> head "right now" and wait for a week without commits and without > > >>> reports to handle left - it will come soon afterwards anyway.. > > >> > > >> That's how I've done it in the past. It works... > > > > > > Well, the idea is to make it more frequent. > > > > Okay. Then let's keep the current model and just do the releases more > > often. ;) > > > > On a related matter: What about an 1.0 release in the mid-term future? > > What would be _your_ wishlist for StumpWM 1.0? > > For one: finish the "float" groups. It's really in alpha state right > now. I don't use them myself but it's already halfway there and it's a > good proof of concept for the new group "abstraction" layer which > would make it possible to use different management modes for each > group.
I've written a patch that enables you to interactively resize the windows in float-group. I'll post it this evening if anyone is interested. I've actually already tried to post it but somehow that git email tool didn't work... Cheers _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel