Hi Kamil, What I meant was that the actual patches applied to the master branch didn't include the formatting changes. It's a bit of an anal bookkeeping request but that's how I am I guess :).
I think all those patches in your branch wrapped into a single one--minus the unrelated formatting changes--would be okay. -Shawn On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Kamil Shakirov <kamil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Shawn, > > > On 10/15/2012 11:42 PM, Shawn Betts wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Kamil Shakirov <kamil...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have ported the latest StumpWM to LispWorks 6.x (tested with LW Pro >>> and Personal editions). Is anyone interested in merging it? >> >> >> Hi Kamil, >> >> I had a look at the patches and they all seem good except for the >> initial port df2227d on github. There are formatting changes that are >> irrelevant to the port. If you can eliminate those, I'll pull it into >> master. > > > Sorry about that ;-) I just commited a patch 13cd2eb that removes irrelevant > formatting from make-image.lisp.in file. > > Thanks a lot for the StumpWM. > >> Thanks! >> >> -Shawn >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Stumpwm-devel mailing list >> Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel >> > > > -- > --ska. _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
