On 10/16/2012 12:58 AM, Shawn Betts wrote:
Hi Kamil,
What I meant was that the actual patches applied to the master branch
didn't include the formatting changes. It's a bit of an anal
bookkeeping request but that's how I am I guess :).
Ok :)
I think all those patches in your branch wrapped into a single
one--minus the unrelated formatting changes--would be okay.
Did the latest commit 13cd2eb fix that? :) As I can see now the only
changes left (I checked the diff between master and lispworks branches)
are only related to LispWorks port.
As for the explicit Quicklisp loading code (that may seem to be
unrelated) in make-image.lisp.in and manual.lisp, LispWorks doesn't read
a user's init script before calling eval from a command line or
saving/delivering an image so we have to load Quicklisp/ASDF first.
Or am I missing something? :)
-Shawn
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Kamil Shakirov <kamil...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Shawn,
On 10/15/2012 11:42 PM, Shawn Betts wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Kamil Shakirov <kamil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
I have ported the latest StumpWM to LispWorks 6.x (tested with LW Pro
and Personal editions). Is anyone interested in merging it?
Hi Kamil,
I had a look at the patches and they all seem good except for the
initial port df2227d on github. There are formatting changes that are
irrelevant to the port. If you can eliminate those, I'll pull it into
master.
Sorry about that ;-) I just commited a patch 13cd2eb that removes irrelevant
formatting from make-image.lisp.in file.
Thanks a lot for the StumpWM.
Thanks!
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
--
--ska.
--
--ska.
_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
