On 15 January 2015 at 01:07, Diogo F. S. Ramos <d...@riseup.net> wrote: > I couldn't find a list of the supported Common Lisp implementations. Is > there one?
Probably not an accurate one. The README states "sbcl, clisp, ccl and ecl". Makefile.in is likely a good list of those that people have made it support in the past (although it's worth noting that "getting it running" and "building an executable image" aren't exactly the same problem - I've had it sort of running under abcl in the past). wrappers.lisp contains a load of junk[0] which I believe was originally copied verbatim from elsewhere. It should really be done away with and replaced with compatibility libraries from quicklisp. In my experience: sbcl, clisp and ccl usually work, whereas ecl is a bit of a moving target. I don't know about LispWorks but the person who did the port can probably provide more enlightenment there. Of course a major factor is which lisps currently have a working clx. I believe the clx that most people use is currently under stewardship of the sharplispers; they may have a list of implementations they aim to support. Ben [0] Although not as much as it used to! https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/commit/2ca1e14119db9c14bec2db1347cb2d868149e5bb _______________________________________________ Stumpwm-devel mailing list Stumpwm-devel@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
